I became an atheist in the 6th grade. My teacher was expounding upon the ancient mythologies of the Greek and Roman gods. I interjected that Christianity was just as fictional as the Greek and Roman legends. I had previously debated my Southern Baptist father on this subject and found his arguments irrational. A rational person does not accept something written in an ancient text as proof of anything. The idea that humanoid gods with wings existed seemed ludicrous. I created a bit of panic for my 6th grade teacher when I asked her why the Bible stories about angels with wings should be believed, but Pegasus was a fictional mythology.
You can guess how the rest of the discussion went. The teacher said that horses with wings don't exist. I said humans with wings do not exist. I added that since ancient people thought the gods lived up in the clouds, giving them wings was perfectly rational. But now that we know that gods do not exist in the clouds, why do we believe in ancient stories about gods with wings? My 6th grade class became very interested in discussing my question but the lessons in Greek and Roman mythology ended abruptly that day.
Having grown up attending Sunday school classes and learning the Bible stories, I had previously questioned the validity of stories such as Jonah and the Whale and Noah's Ark. I learned the meaning of the word allegory at a young age. That was my father's answer to everything. What proof was there that the stories of angels, Satan, Heaven, or Hell had any validity. Should we simply accept as facts everything our parents teach us?
I realized that I was an atheist. Everything I have learned about religions has solidified my conviction that all religions are simply mythology. But at a young age I learned a simple truth, that people do not want to hear any argument which makes them question their religious beliefs. My father ended our discussions, and my mother said I was going to hell.
Now I am in my sixties and I think there are important reasons to open the eyes of the billions of theists who cling to absurd mythologies. My website is a very short book that starts with the illogical nature of belief in supernatural entities , walks you through the development of religions, and then covers a brief history of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.
My short book has a definite purpose. I start and end with the major reason I feel religions should be rejected universally. Religious beliefs are founded on fictional stories. When people can be convinced to kill other people based solely on differing religious fictional stories, the world has a major problem. Thousands of people are killed every year because of differing religious beliefs, but my greatest concern is a nuclear armed Iran. Iranian military leaders should be believed when they say they want to wipe Israel off the map. The Holocaust was a horrendous tragedy and the world cannot afford to have a similar tragedy repeated.
Trying to save Jews by convincing them and other people that their religions are a fraud is a daunting task, but one cannot point out the absurdity of Islam without agreeing to the absurdity of all religious beliefs. Calling any religion absurd may seem unduly harsh but that is the point of my short book. There are better books on atheism but mine is free. Any atheist debating a religious believer will want to read my book.
The Inquisition, Martin Luther, and the Holocaust
I do not think that Christianity in this day and time poses the same risk as Islam, but it is important to understand how religious beliefs have led to inhuman and immoral actions in the past. The Holocaust is always blamed on Hitler and the Nazi Party with almost no mention of the role religious indoctrination played in the horrific events.
The treatment of Jews by the Roman Catholic Church varied over centuries. In the 12th century the church established an office of inquisition which was tasked with the goal of rooting out and punishing heresy. Punishments, tortures, and executions took place all over Europe. One may ask how could one person treat another person so inhumanely? The answer is that the Catholic Church looked at Jews as being subhuman. This was church doctrine. The Spanish inquisition lasted for 200 years, and 32,000 people were executed. Records for how many were executed in other countries are sparse, but it is believed to have been in the thousands.
A pogrom is a mass execution of a religious or ethnic group. The first pogrom of Jews in Germany occurred in 1241 in Frankfurt and 180 Jews were murdered. In 1288 108 Jews were murdered in Bonn. Gathering Jews for mass execution did not start with the Holocaust.
Martin Luther is famous for being a priest who started a protest against some rules of the Catholic Church. His followers were called Protestants. After he separated from the Catholic Church he started a Protestant Church which later became the Lutheran Church after his death. In 1543 Martin Luther published a 65,000 word treatise named "On the Jews and Their Lies". Luther wrote that Jewish churches should be burned, Jewish property confiscated, and all Jews should be expelled from the country or forced into slave labor. There is a line where he wrote, "we are at fault for not slaying them".
The German Evangelical Church applauded the antisemitic rhetoric of Adolph Hitler, and helped promote the National Socialists Party. In the days after the Kristallnacht, the Bishop of Thüringen wrote happily that Luther, who was born on November 10th, couldn't wish a more beautiful birthday gift. Hitler made Martin Luther's anti-Semitic view a part of his National Socialist Party dogma. Jews were blamed for the World War I defeat and the economic collapse after the war. Intense hatred of Jews was common place in Germany before World War II.
At each early step in the persecution of the Jews there was approval and not condemnation from Lutheran churches. In fact there was little condemnation from any church. Few people had a better understanding of the evolution of the Holocaust than William Shirer. In his classic book, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer argues that Luther had basically drafted the blueprints for the Holocaust, concluding that his “advice was literally followed.”
The antisemitism in Europe was the culmination of centuries of propaganda from the Roman Catholic Church. Putting the blame for the Holocaust on the Roman Catholic Church and the virulent antisemitism of Martin Luther is not some radical fringe theory, but the conclusion of many Jewish and non-Jewish scholars. The immoral treatment of one religious group by another religious group based on centuries old dogma is still one of the world's biggest problems.
What is a religion?
Before discussing religions, one must agree on the definition used. What is the definition of religion? The most common definition of a religion includes a belief in supernatural entities or supernatural events. Anything supernatural is outside the realm of the natural world. A supernatural entity or event can not be explained or proven by science which tries to explain everything in the natural world. No one can prove the existence of angels any more than the existence of leprachauns. One believes in supernatural entities only because someone else has convinced them they exist.
Many times Confucianism will be included in a list of religions. Confucus was an ordinary human who advised people on how they should live. Confucianism is not a religion. An argument is often made that Buddha was an ordinary man who preached how to live. Unless you have ordinary friends with the power of telepathy, I would say that Buddha's power of telepathy puts him in the supernatural department. Buddha also told followers that humans can be reborn as animals.
People are taught to believe in supernatural entities or events, but one would think that our natural skepticism would significantly slow the popularity of religious beliefs. If I said that I witnessed a man walking on water, everyone would be highly skeptical. If I asked a Christian if he believed Jesus walked on water, the answer would probably be yes. Why do people accept the veracity of words written in an ancient text? Do the ancient texts contain a large number of scientifically correct truths? Do the texts contain historical truths? Do the texts contain moral truths?
We like to think of humans as being rational creatures, but there is a large body of scientific evidence that says man is more of an emotional creature than a rational creature. Some people tend toward more rational behavior and some toward the emotional. A rational approach to any supernatural entity of event would be to question the validity of the claims. The emotional side of us accepts as truths claims which make us feel good without defending the rationality or the logic of such claims.
The Ultimate Rationalist: David Hume and the Burden of Proof
David Hume wrote about the battle between the logical mind and the emotional mind in his book, A Treatise Of Human Nature, published in 1739. As a thoroughly rational man he rejected all beliefs in religious dogma on miracles or supernatural entities. Because there was no proof that anything written in the Bible was true, he rejected it. His book laid the foundation for the field of psychology which centuries later has proven many of his theories to be valid.
Atheists are deeply rational. Despite what you might read, atheism is not a religion. Atheism means no beliefs in supernatural entities of events, hence no beliefs in any religion. I do not believe that humans can walk on water. I do not believe that angels exist. But I cannot prove that such an event never occurred or that such a creature never existed. If I approached the matter in the scientific tradition I would say that the probability of angels existing is very low, and the probability that ancient texts describing angels are pure fiction is very high.
Science is founded on the concept of burden of proof. I like the use of the term burden, because if you want to convince me that angels exist, it is your burden to show me the evidence. The logical person rejects the claims until the burden of proof is met. The emotional mind favors an emotional opinion over facts and rejects a discussion about the probability they could be wrong.
David Hume wrote about the physical stress caused religious beliefs. On one hand a person wants to believe that the Bible is full of eternal truths but on the other hand the Bible says that the Earth is flat and the sun rotates around the Earth. Today this would be described as causing cognitive dissonance. To avoid cognitive dissonance the religious believer avoids reading or discussing anything which would disturb his religious beliefs.
Science is built on providing the burden of proof. Isaac Newton changed the way people looked at planetary motion, but said he expected someone in the future to make his theory obsolete. Albert Einstein did make Newton's theory obsolete, but said the same thing about his theory. There are no absolutes in science only the preponderance of evidence.
Take any religious belief in a supernatural entity and ask what scientific facts support a belief in this entity. The answer is always none. All religions are mythology passed down generation after generation. No one has proof that an angel exists. As David Hume said, just because someone wrote down a story many generations ago, this doesn't count as any proof.
Curiosity Demands Answers and Religions Are Created
Anyone who has raised a child understands the natural curiosity of humans. Adults are expected to give the answers. But what happens when the adults do not have the answer? The first step in developing religions was solving the problem of answering questions when no one knew the true answers. And the answers were fictional stories. This is an important point, religions started with fictional stories from the very beginning to give answers to naturally curious humans.
Travel the world and examine religious beliefs and one will universally be given a story about the creation of the Earth. Some curious human in every community eventually would ask who created the Earth. There would be a need for an answer. The answers would become the dogma of the religious beliefs. One solution to answering the question of who created the Earth would be to answer truthfully, we really don't know. Obviously taking into account the known history of the world, this solution was rejected and the fictional mythology solution was adapted.
One of the toughest questions a human can ask is what happens to me after I die. It is a question we cannot honestly answer. I believe that Christianity became the world's most popular religion because it gives the most emotionally satisfying answer to the most worrisome question. Religious people believe in the mythology of heaven because it says it exists in their ancient texts. So what if almost everything else in this text is scientifically wrong or historically inaccurate. It frees us from worrying about our mortality.
Having an afterlife is a common feature in many religions. Homo-sapiens are the lucky beneficiaries of a larger neocortex due to a genetic change. This is estimated to have occurred about 500,000 years ago. The big bang (or god) created the universe 14 billion years ago, but 500,000 years ago we came on the scene and are privileged among all creatures on the planet to have a place arranged for us to go after our mortal death, so we can be immortal like god.
Bonobos apes are less intelligent so they are left out of this deal. We do not know if this heaven will have any other animals other than humans. Insects surely will be excluded. But the rules on getting into this heaven have varied over time and even today there isn't universal agreement on the rules for various religions. There are about 300 billion stars in our galaxy, and there are 100 billion galaxies. I am bothered that anyone thinks the god that made the universe looks like an advanced ape. But maybe the statement that humans were made in the image of God has another interpretation.
There is an argument that God exists because we are proof of god's intelligent design. Which happens to be the most egocentric line of reasoning ever spoken. I suppose the dinosaurs were designed to go extinct along with thousands of other creatures designed by god that went extinct. When the next genetic mutation occurs making homo-sapiens look more like bonobos, do we get kicked out of heaven?
Bonobo Apes and Rules
The bonobo ape is our closest relative in the animal world. They live in groups which are rarely larger than 100. Studies of Bonobo ape colonies have revealed that interactions between apes are not identical when comparing one ape colony to another. Researchers have been surprised by the complexity of colony norms of behavior. The conclusion is that not all behavior in ape colonies is hereditary. Some rules of behavior are definitely taught.
Hunter gatherer tribes live in groups similar to the Bonobo apes. They followed a similar pattern with groups separating after reaching numbers very close to the size of Bonobo colonies. Hunter gatherer tribes developed clear norms for behavior which varied from one group to the next, and these rules would be passed down from one generation to the next. Surprisingly some hunter gatherer tribes had as few as ten definable rules of behavior.
As curious animals with a larger brain, humans invariably came up with fictional answers to the unanswerable questions life presented. These answers became the religious dogma of the tribe. With very rare exceptions hunter gather tribes adopted beliefs in a God or multiple Gods. In a Bonobo colony an ape breaking the rules or norm of behavior in a colony might be chased out of the colony by the leader, or attacked physically other apes for the transgression. The same was true in hunter gatherer tribes. But we know that in hunter gatherer tribes the members breaking rules were taught to expect punishment from the God or Gods encompassed by the tribe's religious beliefs as well as punishment from members of the tribe.
Cities and Religions Grow
With the development of agriculture and domesticated animals societies changed drastically. Small tribes developed into cities that grew in size dramatically. The biggest change which required a significant increase in the number of rules for behavior was the transition from communal property to private property. In hunter gather tribes members of the tribe had few if any personal possessions. Everything was shared. When domesticated animals first began to replace hunting as the primary source of food, all of the animals would belong to the tribe. With early agriculture the food produced would belong to the tribe.
With the advent of larger cities, extended families became the tribes which comprised a city population. Personal property replaced communal ownership for a group. Rules on transactions concerning personal property between members of the society became necessary. Rules on inheritance of personal property became necessary. The list of rules which the members of the society or city needed to learn grew rapidly. The rules of normal behavior and the supernatural dogma of societies became the religion of the members. This progress occurred similarly in societies throughout the world.
Having the fear of both civil punishment for transgressions as well as godly punishment appears to have been very effective. The gods varied widely and the punishments for a transgressions such as stealing from a neighbor also varied widely from one society to the next, but having a belief in Gods handing out punishment rules is almost universal.
Religious Law Codes
As cities grew in size and complexity it became necessary to increase the number of rules. The laws were codified as the religious dogma. A priestly class developed to help the leaders determine the guilt or innocence of people accused of transgressions. The leader of the city was often the head of the priestly class and was endowed with divine judgment. The laws were universally presented as being handed down from Gods to the ruler or the head priest.
For two millennium the Laws of Moses were the most well known example of laws handed down by a God to mortals with a requirement to obey the laws or else suffer the civil punishment and the godly wrath. Almost every civilization had such laws handed down by God or Gods. Clay tablets from Sumerian cities containing lists of laws have survived, and reveal the role religions played in the ancient cities. Currently the oldest text is called the Code of Ur-Nammu and was written in 2100 BC. In all of the early law codes discovered these tablets start of by thanking various gods for giving the people these laws. The laws did not come from the ruler or the head priest. It was made clear to the people that these laws came from gods.
The first Ur-Nammu laws are very standard. 1. If a man commits a murder, that man must be killed. 2. If a man commits a robbery, he will be killed. The laws become more complex as you go down the list and the Code confirms that in 2100 BC legal marriages existed, and legal divorces took place (law 9. If a man divorces his first-time wife, he shall pay (her) one mina of silver).
The Code of Hammurabi was etched into a large stone around 1750 BC. It predates the Laws of Moses by several centuries. Although the Code of Hammurabi had half of the number of laws as compared to the Laws of Moses, it is considered to more advanced judicially. The code is one of the earliest examples of the idea of presumption of innocence, and it also suggests that both the accused and accuser have the opportunity to provide evidence. Multiple clay tablets exist with portions of the Hammurabi code and later code law tablets exist which incorporate revisions of the Hammurabi code.
Religion and Morality
Morality is a society's opinion on whether a behavior is either good or is bad. Morality can vary from one society to another, and moral values can change drastically over time. At one time it was deemed a good behavior to own another person as a slave. Slavery existed in all corners of the world and was considered moral by almost every society. Clergy worldwide owned slaves. Society changed its opinion on slavery and now in most societies it would be very bad behavior to own a slave. For every group of people to exist cooperatively it is necessary to adopt standards for morality.
The problem with religions is that the laws on morality were supposedly given to us by an all knowing God. One would expect the morality of a God would not change over time. Jews have a hard time defending why their religious texts see no moral issue with slavery. Christians cannot claim that Jesus spoke against slavery. Christians don't deal with all of the laws of Moses but they must face the fact that the ten commandments recommend death as a punishment for adultery and homosexual sex. Even the most ardent fundamentalist Christian would disagree with the punishment recommended in Leviticus. Ironically Christians castigate fundamentalist Muslims who do kill homosexuals yet these Muslims are simply obeying what is written in the Old Testament.
Plagiarism: Gilgamesh Flood Story and Noah's Ark
Sumer was one of the world's earliest civilizations. It developed in Mesopotamia which is Iraq today, cities grew along the shores of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers around 5000 BC. Initially there were separate city states, each with its local ruler. The ancient city Uruk was located on a branch of the Euphrates River named Erech. In 2900 BC Uruk was possibly the largest city in the world with 50,000 to 80,000 citizens in a walled city. King Gilgamesh ruled Uruk around 2700 BC. Posthumously he was deified and legends about Gilgamesh became very popular.
One of the first written languages, cuneiform, was developed in Uruk around 3200 BC. The language was inscribed on wet clay tablets. Despite being written on fragile clay tablets, it is estimated that 1,000,000 tablets have been discovered by archaeologists. In 1849 British archaeologists discovered the greatest treasure trove of tablets in the ancient city of Nineveh near the modern city Mosul, Iraq. King Ashurbanipal ruled the Neo-Assyrian empire from 669 to 631 BC. The king built a great library which included older tablets he had collected and tablets written for his library. The archaeologists had discovered the King Ashurbanipal library. Twelve tablets contained portions of a narrative which has been named the Epic of Gilgamesh. The Gilgamesh tablets from the ruins of the library of Ashurbanipal were written around 1300 to 1000 BC.
The Epic of Gilgamesh is the world's first recorded fictional narrative. Although the tablets were discovered in 1849, no one could translate the language. In 1872 a translation of the twelve Gilgamesh tablets was released to the world. Immediately readers noticed the striking similarity between a flood story in one of the Gilgamesh tablets, and the Noah flood story. Biblical apologists pointed out the differences, but the order in which events occurred in each story has a correlation which cannot be refuted. The entire text of Gilgamesh tablet 11 is available online. I would ask the reader to compare each story line by line and make your own judgment. The Noah legend was written centuries after the library of Ashurbanipal tablet version of the Gilgamesh flood story was committed to the clay tablets. The Noah legend clearly derives from the Gilgamesh legend.
There are significant differences between the stories. In the Gilgamesh flood legend the Gods were mad at the city, “Shuruppak, on the banks of the Euphrates and its people”. The Gods wanted to destroy this city and not all of mankind as in the Noah version.
The Gilgamesh flood story was far more believable than the Noah story. Utanapishtim loaded the boat with “all of the beasts and animals of the field” which clearly referred to his domesticated livestock. Whereas Noah was asked to load,”Two of every kind of bird, of every kind of animal and every kind of creature that moves along the ground”.
The Euphrates River was prone to flooding and there is historical evidence of great floods destroying entire cities. The Gilgamesh flood story was believable. The Noah legend is a greatly exaggerated version of a flood disaster in which god kills everyone on the planet and made everyone descendants of Noah's family. There are references to the Noah legend in the Old and New Testaments, and the story was assumed to have been a factual event until scientific knowledge ruled out that possibility. When confronted with facts that make it impossible for the Noah legend to have been an historical event, biblical apologists have said the Noah story is only allegorical.
Jesus compares Noah's flood with the coming Day of Judgment: "Just as it was in the days of Noah, so too it will be in the days of the coming of the Son of Man. For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man." Clearly, Jesus thought the Noah story was an actual event and not an allegory.
The Gilgamesh boat was made of reeds and was round. If one lived on the banks of the Euphrates River in 1000 BC, this is the type of boat they used. Kuphars were used on the Euphrates for 2000 years. The size of the Kuphar described in the Gilgamesh story is greatly exaggerated, but large wooden boats like the ark described in the Noah story did not exist on these shallow rivers.
The Ashurbanipal tablet 11 version of the Gilgamesh flood story was simply the first translation of a cuneiform tablet with the Gilgamesh flood story. Several other tablets have been found with the flood legend that predate the Ashurbanipal tablet, one which has been dated to 1800 BC. All of the tablets translated simply reinforce the common belief that the flood story contained in the Hebrew Bible is simply an exaggerated plagiarism of the Gilgamesh legend.
Genesis and Ancient Mythology
Thanks to the thousands of cuneiform tablets that have been translated we know a great deal about Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. These myths predate anything written in Genesis. The depiction of the cosmology described in the beginning of Genesis is identical to the cosmology which was described in Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water” is from Genesis, but this concept of water above the vault and water below is contained in Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. The order in which Earth is formed in Genesis matches the order found on an ancient Babylonian tablet. First a divine spirit created cosmic matter. Second, a mass of water had to be separated. Third, dry land was formed. Fourth was the creation of the sun, moon, and stars. Fifth, man was created. And sixth, the gods rested after creating man.
“Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.“ There are different terms used in different Bibles, but forming man from dust of the ground or clay is straight out of Sumerian and Babylonian mythology.
“Now the Lord God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. ” A tree of knowledge of good and evil is part of Sumerian mythology. The concept of the tree of life is from both Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. In Babylonian mythology, the Tree of Life was a magical tree that grew in the center of paradise. The Apsu, or primordial waters, flowed from its roots. “A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters.”
“The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Ashur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.” We certainly know that Eden was located in Mesopotamia, the birthplace of the Sumerian civilization. Genesis tells us that there was gold, aromatic resin, and onyx in the area. I am not sure why Adam and Eve would need these before being kicked out of Eden, but in Sumerian and Babylonian mythology there would be gold and precious minerals in paradise. This doesn't fit well with the New Testament's admonishments against coveting wealth.
“But for Adam no suitable helper was found. So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man’s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.” In Sumerian mythology Ninti is the goddess of life. Ninti is also one of the eight goddesses of healing. Her specific healing area was the rib (In Sumerian Ti means rib and to live). Enki (god of creation) had eaten forbidden flowers and was then cursed. Ninti heals Enki by removing the pain in his rib. There are obvious similarities to the story in Genesis.
“After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.” For decades I wondered why god would post two chubby little angels to guard the entrance to Eden. Cherubim are the most frequently occurring heavenly creature in the Hebrew Bible, with the Hebrew word appearing 91 times. In Ezekiel 1:5-11 two cherub are described as having the likeness of a man, and having four faces: that of a man, a lion (on the right side), and ox (on the left side), and an eagle. Between the cherubim glowing coals that moved between them could be seen, their fire "went up and down", and lightning burst forth from it. In Ezekiel chapter ten, another full description of the cherubim appears with slight differences in details. Three of the four faces are the same – man, lion and eagle – but where chapter one has the face of an ox, Ezekiel 10:14 says "face of a cherub”. Clearly these biblical images do not match the modern concept of a cherub.
From the internet; cherub,a winged angelic being described in biblical tradition as attending on God. It is represented in ancient Middle Eastern art as a lion or bull with eagles' wings and a human face. With a little research I realized that a cherub is a lamassu. A lamassu is a Sumerian protective deity. Belief in lamassu became part of Babylonian and Assyrian mythology. Statues of lamassu date back to 3000 BC. It was common to have two lamassu guarding entrances to important buildings. So cherubim are not the sweet little angels depicted in European art, but are Sumerian mythical protective beasts placed at the entrance to Eden.
Besides two cherubs guarding the entrance to the Garden of Eden, god leaves a flaming sword. One of the tablets recovered from the Library of Ashurbanipal describes a Babylonian protective god, Asaruludu, who wields a flaming sword and "assures the most perfect safety". Line after line of Genesis is Sumerian or Babylonian mythology rewritten for the Hebrew text.
If the reader is interested in more details on the many links between the stories contained on ancient Sumerian cuneiform tablets and the Hebrew Bible I would recommend History begins at Sumer by Samuel Noah Kramer.
Cain and Able in Genesis
Genesis has Cain and Able being the third and fourth humans born. Cain was a farmer and Able a shepard. It was very handy that Cain and Able did not need to be hunter gatherers. Earlier in Genesis we learned that god created wild animals on one day and domesticated animals on another day. They were apparently born with the knowledge of farming and domesticated animals right from the start as the third and fourth humans. As soon as these men are successful, they make offerings to God.
Apparently God was unhappy with Cain's offering. Cain was jealous of Able and killed him. God casts him out to wander in the wilderness. Cain says, “I will be a restless wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.” This seems strange because according Genesis there isn't anyone else on the planet. So who exactly will kill Cain. Cain wanders east of Eden and finds a wife. Genesis doesn't explain where this wife came from.
Cain was very productive and built a city. One of his progeny Tubal - Cain worked with bronze and iron. Referring to one of the first humans as having skills working with iron is just one of many anachronisms in the Hebrew Bible. 1 Samuel 13:19 "Now there was no blacksmith to be found throughout all the land of Israel, for the Philistines said, Lest the Hebrews make themselves swords or spears." It is historically accurate that the Hebrews were late in developing skills in making iron weapons.
Mathuselah Lived 900 Years
One mystery unraveled in the 20th century was the extreme longevity of Adam and his progeny. Adam was 130 when he had Seth, and Adam lived another 800 years giving birth to many more children. Seth lived 912 years, and Seth's son Enosh lived 905 years. Kenan lived 910 years, Mahalalel 895, Jared 962, Enoch 365, Methuselah 969, and Lamech 777. Lamech was the father of Noah. At age 500 Noah gave birth to Shem, Ham and Japheth.
Why Noah and all of the ancestors before Noah lived hundreds of years was a big mystery. The mystery was solved in the 20th century when a clay tablet was found giving a list of Sumerian kings. The list was separated into two parts separated by a great flood. The Sumerian kings prior to the flood were listed as living hundreds of years. The kings after the flood lived normal life spans. There are now multiple sources for the Sumerian list of Kings. The oldest sources is dated as 2000 BC.
The Sumerian King List provides a list of eight kings who reigned for long periods of time before the flood. Between Adam and Noah there are eight generations, just as there are eight kings listed before the great flood. The eight people mentioned in Genesis lived hundreds of year. The eight Kings before the great flood lived thousands of years. The is no historical evidence for the eight kings listed before the great flood, but we should not expect to find historical evidence of these Kings names. Archeologists have discovered evidence of a catastrophic flood occuring on the Euphrates River around 2900 to 3000 BC. Cunieform was estimated to have been used starting around 3000 BC. Prior to 3000 BC none of the history was recorded because there was no written language.
After the great flood the Kings on the list began to live normal life spans. This makes sense because scribes began to record the names and dates of rulers. The earliest listed ruler on the Sumerian List of Kings whose historicity has been archaeologically verified is Enmebaragesi of Kish, c. 2600 BC. The historical proof of the accuracy of the Sumerian Kings List increases as list progresses in time. The Hebrew author of Genesis named eight people from Adam to Noah in precisely the same manner as the eight pre-flood list of Sumerian Kings. The absurd longevity of the people on the Kings List was mirrored in the Bible story. It is difficult to believe that this is just a coincidence.
For over 1000 years Biblical scholars had tried to explain Genesis 6. “The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them." In the 20th century Sumerian and Babylonian cuneiform tablets were deciphered revealing many stories about Nephilim. King Gilgamesh was an historical figure, but after his death, his legend made him a Nephilim.
Genesis is basically a plagiarism of Sumerian and Babylonian mythology from the first sentence to the last chapter. One religious mythology borrowing from another more ancient one. For a more detailed discussion of how the Hebrew Book of Genesis borrowed from Sumerian and Babylonian mythology, I would suggest Hebrew Myths: The Book of Genesis by Robert Graves and Raphael Patai. This is a scholarly text which gives details, but assumes that the reader already has a knowledge of ancient history.
Noah, his Progeny and the Tower of Babel
Noah is a fictional character given credit for being the first human to till the soil and the person who invented wine, two proclamations as easily disproved as the flood myth. In Genesis 11, we learn where the progeny of Noah settled. This chapter has zero credibility and zero historical value. Jewish scholars admit that the narrative of Noah's descendants creating the cities mentioned in the Hebrew Bible is entirely false. Historical data destroys what is stated in Genesis.
The plagiarism of the Noah flood story from the Gilgamesh epic is only one example of borrowing mythology. The Tower of Babel story has obvious similarities to a Sumerian legend, Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta, where the god Enki multiplies languages. In Genesis before God destroys the Tower of Babel we have the line, “Now the whole world had one language and a common speech.” If the world was repopulated by descendants of Noah's family it would make sense that everyone would speak the same language. The Tower of Babel story tries to explain why people who were descendants of one family would speak many different languages within a few generations.
The word babel refers to confused speech. Most people believe using the name Babel, in the Tower of Babel, refers to Babel as confused speech as in the Genesis story. But the capital city of Babylonia was Babylon (modern Baghdad) and in Genesis 11:9 and other sources Babylon is also referred to as Babel. In Babylon (or Babel) an immense temple named the Etemenanki was built around 1300 BC. It was the tallest structure in the Middle East and the tower was 91 meters. The Tower of Babel (or Babylon) was the Etemenanki. People think that naming the Tower of Babel has an association with the modern word babel, but the word babel is derived from the Genesis story which refers to a specific tower in the city of Babel.
Noah is mentioned multiple times in the Old Testament and the New Testament. Everything one learns about Noah in both texts is either plagiarized legends or easily disproved facts. For centuries anything written in the Bible was the word of God, and arguing otherwise was blasphemy. Now scholarly research has revealed the truth, and defenders of the scriptures have no answers for people who refer to the Bible as fictional or mythological.
Abraham : Prophet of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam
At the end of Exodus 11 we are introduced to Abraham. “Terah took his son Abram, his grandson Lot son of Haran, and his daughter-in-law Sarai, the wife of his son Abram, and together they set out from Ur of the Chaldeans to go to Canaan. But when they came to Harran, they settled there.” Later God tells Abram to leave Harran and go to the land of Canaan. In Canaan God changes Abram's name to Abraham and promises Abraham that he will be a great ruler over the lands of Canaan.
Over half of the world's population are either Christian or Muslim. Both of these religions are offshoots of Judaism. Judaism begins with Abraham. According to the Jewish Bible, Abraham was born and raised in a Sumerian city called Ur which was in modern day Iraq. His birth has been estimated to be between 1700 and 1800 BC based on events in the Jewish Bible narrative. We know that the Sumerian city states including Ur were conquered by an Akkadian, Sargon the Great, in 2300 BC. The Akkadians used a Semitic language which replaced the Sumerian language after a few centuries. Abraham and his people used the Semitic language.
Historically Ur was in decline around 1750 B.C. due to crop failures. The city had a massive irrigation canal system and over many years the irrigated land built up salinity in the soil, which eventually led to crop failures. Ur lost much of its population as people left in search of fertile land. Historical evidence for a large scale emigration from Ur during the period of time Abraham left his city lends credence to the historicity of the Abraham legend.
A thorough inspection of all references to Abraham in ancient Hebrew texts has resulted in the conclusion that the story of Abraham was written in the iron age. The legend was passed down orally through generations, but was finally put to print centuries later. The biggest problem with the story of Abraham is God's promise that Abraham would rule over the land of Canaan. Abraham did not become a great leader that ruled over the lands of Canaan. Other than the Hebrew texts there is no historical record of a Jewish leader named Abraham.
Abraham and Child Sacrifice
The most well known story concerning Abraham is God’s request to Abraham to sacrifice his son. Jewish and Christian scholars have said that god never intended for Abraham to sacrifice Isaac, but the story only makes sense if Jews were accustomed to human sacrifice. Abraham does not argue with god about the demand to kill his son, and Abraham is praised for his willingness to sacrifice his son.
In various parts of the Hebrew Bible there are references to god forbidding human sacrifices but long after Abraham, the Israelite warrior Jephthah sacrificed his virgin daughter to God in fulfillment of a vow he made to secure God’s help in battle. The same ideology can be seen in some early accounts of the Canaanite conquest, in which God gives the Israelite a victory against Canaanite armies, and the Israelite in turn slaughter all of the women and children as a sacrifice to God in payment to God for his aid.
Logically the Jewish Bible would have no need to warn Jews about not practicing child sacrifice if the Jews never sacrificed children. Jeremiah 7:31 and Ezekiel 20:25–6 speak disapprovingly of sacrificing children to God. “For the Judahites have done evil in my sight. They have set their abominations in the House over which my Name is invoked, defiling it. They build the shrines of the Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire—which I did not command, nor did it arise in my mind.” (Jeremiah 7:30–31)
The Babylonians under Nebuchadnezzar II conquered Judah in 1586 and took thousands of Jews back to Babylon as slaves. There is a consensus among biblical scholars that much of the Hebrew Bible was written in Babylon while the Jews were exiled in Babylon. Later in life Nebuchadnezzar II stopped the practice of human sacrifice. An inscription found among the ruins on the Tigris, and now in the East India House at London, gives an account of the various works of Nebuchadnezzar II at Babylon and Borsippa. The record says, "He intermitted the worship of Merodach, and put an end to the sacrifice of victims".
It seems that the Jews in exile in Babylon decided to create their own religious history giving Abraham and his followers credit for stopping human sacrifice. The fact that Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son contradicts the idea that the early Jews did not sacrifice children. Admonishments against sacrifices would not be needed if the practice had already stopped, and there is the clear reference to Jephthah sacrificing his daughter.
Abraham and Monotheism
Judaism is often referred to as one of the first monotheistic religions because Abraham told his people to only worship Jehovah. True Monotheism is the belief in the existence of only one god. In the strictest definition of monotheism, there is only one god mentioned in all of the religious dogma. This definition is not used by the vast majority of religious scholars. The term monotheism has come to mean a religion where one all powerful being created the universe and rules over all other gods. There can be many gods in a religion, but if one god is the ruler over all of the other gods it is commonly called a monotheistic religion. Monolatry is the correct term for having one god that rulers over many gods.
By any definition of a god, angels are gods. Satan is a god. Jehovah is the all powerful god who created the universe, but Jehovah is still locked in battle with Satan who was one of Jehovah's creations. God has his army of immortal angels. All of the angels are gods that live eternally. There are true monotheistic religions in which only one all powerful supernatural being exists. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are not monotheistic by the true definition.
Judaism is simply an offshoot of Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. These mythologies accepted the existence of many gods. Having gods with wings was a common motif. The top picture to the left is a stone carving depicting a Sumerian god. The earliest known depiction of a human with wings is a clay figurine found in Iraq that is dated to 5000 BC. The concept of winged gods or angels did not start with Judaism. The archangels of the Hebrew Bible were copied from the gods of Sumerian and Babylonian mythology. According to Rabbi Simeon ben Lakish of Tiberias (230-270 C.E.), all the specific names for the angels were brought back by the exiled Jews from Babylonia when they returned to Judah.
When Babylon became the principal city of southern Mesopotamia during the reign of Hammurabi in the 18th century BC, the patron deity of Babylon, Marduk, was elevated to the level of supreme god. Long before Abraham espoused the concept of a single supreme god, Hammurabi ascribed to the concept of a single supreme being that ruled over the other gods (monolatry). Marduk was a supreme god before Judaism was a religion.
More Plagiarism: The Moses Birth Story
Exodus is all about Moses. A majority of biblical scholars have come to the conclusion that Moses is a fictional character. Scholars have come to this conclusion due to the lack of historical evidence supporting the Bible narratives and the existing evidence which contradicts those narratives. Translations of ancient cuneiform tablets from the Middle East, and hieroglyphics from Egypt have greatly expanded our knowledge of ancient history. We have learned that stories such as the Noah flood myth are simply plagiarized versions of far more ancient myths.
In Exodus we learn about Moses being placed in a basket and released into the water by his mother. It wasn't until the 20th century that we found out that a very well-known person born a thousand years before Moses had an almost identical birth story. It was previously mentioned that Sargon the Great (or Sargon of Akkad) reigned in 2300 BC and conquered the Sumerian city states. He was the founder of the Akkadian Empire. His birth legend is almost identical to the Moses narrative but with a few important differences.
Previously in my blog I discussed the Gilgamesh flood story and explained the use of kuphars. These reed boats were round and the bottom was waterproofed with tar and pitch. A kuphar was essentially a large waterproofed reed basket. In the Middle East tar and pitch which derive from oil was plentiful. The Sargon birth story makes sense because waterproofed baskets would have been available in Mesopotamia.
In the Exodus story a papyrus basket was waterproofed with tar and pitch. Papyrus boats were used in Egypt, but the papyrus reed is hollow and the boats float without being waterproofed with tar and pitch. The boats float because of the air in the reeds and Egyptians had no concept of waterproofing with tar. Unlike the Middle East, Egypt did not have significant supplies of tar and pitch and there is no historical evidence for boats or baskets being waterproofed in this manner. Petroleum derived pitch was imported for use in mummification in Egypt but was expensive and was not used to waterproof vessels. Sargon was a historical person of great importance and his birth legend would have been well known. In his legend his mother placed him in a basket waterproofed with tar. Clearly the Hebrew writer of the Moses birth legend was familiar with the unique birth legend of Sargon the Great, and plagiarized Sargon's legend without knowing that tar and pitch were not used to waterproof baskets or boats in Egypt. The birth story of Moses was clearly plagiarized from the much older legend of Sargon the Great.
Was Moses Ever In Egypt?
The movie, The Ten Commandments, popularized the belief that Jews held as slaves built the pyramids. Egyptians built the Giza Pyramids between 2589 and 2504 BC, a thousand years before Moses was supposedly born. The Hebrew Bible does not mention the pyramids. There is no historical evidence of the Egyptians having large numbers of Jewish slaves. The entire saga of Moses in Egypt is fictional.
“At midnight the Lord struck down all the firstborn in Egypt, from the firstborn of Pharaoh, who sat on the throne, to the firstborn of the prisoner, who was in the dungeon, and the firstborn of all the livestock as well. Pharaoh and all his officials and all the Egyptians got up during the night, and there was loud wailing in Egypt, for there was not a house without someone dead.” The belief that an event of this magnitude escaped being mentioned in any historical document is ludicrous. This would have been a monumental event chronicled in multiple sources. The Hebrew Passover, a major Jewish religious holiday, is based on this fictional story.
All of the plagues that Moses inflicted on the Egyptians have no historical corroboration. There isn't a shred of evidence an important Jewish leader named Moses was ever in Egypt. This is the opinion of the majority of Egyptian and Israeli scholars. If one is interested in a detailed book on the subject I would recommend, Did Moses Exist?: The Myth of the Israelite Lawgiver by D. M. Murdock.
The Laws of Moses
Moses is famous for the ten commandments. But god gave Moses over 600 laws. These laws are fundamental to the Jewish faith. Moses told his followers that the first 10 commandments were no more important than all of the others and god expected all of the laws to be followed.
For many centuries, the Laws of Moses were unique and seemed special. In 1901 a large stone with hundreds of lines of cuneiform was discovered. It was translated in 1902 . The stone contained 282 laws and stated that these laws were a gift of the gods to King Hammurabi. With the discovery of this stone came the realization that god or gods presenting lists of laws to citizens was not unique to only Moses. As more tablets were discovered more law codes were discovered. The Code of the Nesilim, the Code of Lipit-Ishtar, and the Code of Ur-Nammu all state that the laws came from a god and were given to the people to be obeyed.
When Jesus refers to the Laws of Moses in the New Testament he was not referring to only the first ten commandments. To be a Jew one followed all of the Laws of Moses. Jesus said the Laws of Moses must be obeyed, and Jesus was not referring to just the first ten commandments.
Every Christian should read all of the Laws of Moses. My reaction to reading the laws was disbelief that anyone could ever think that these laws were sacred and given to man by an all knowing omnipotent being. There are several laws concerning the treatment of slaves, which means that god condoned slavery. Jesus refers to slaves several times in the New Testament and never condemns slavery. Slavery was commonplace when the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament were written, so it was understandable that the writers treated slavery as being acceptable. If the Hebrew Bible is a sacred text from god, then god must approve of slavery.
The first ten commandments are sacred to Christians. Most Christians can remember half of them, but very few Christians know the punishments Moses attached to the transgressions. The punishments are extremely severe and are far more severe than any ancient Sumerian or Babylonian law code discovered. The punishment for worshiping a false god is death. The punishment for not honoring your parents is death. The punishment for adultery is death. The punishment for homosexuality is death.
What sane person can claim that an all knowing god gave these horrific punishments to Moses and made them sacred laws. How can an intelligent person point to the laws as being sacred, but then disregard the punishments prescribed? Does any Christian agree with their sacred text that we should start killing homosexuals? Fundamentalist Muslims in some countries are still carrying out the Laws of Moses precisely according to the Laws of Moses. Any reasonable person would say that was barbaric, but logically Muslims who condone killing homosexuals are fulfilling the Laws of Moses. If adultery was punishable by death as prescribed in the Tanakh, our current populations would be shrinking rapidly. Common sense tells us that a person cannot say they believe in the Laws of Moses but reject the punishments associated with those laws. Yet this is exactly what every modern Jew and Christian does.
Joshua: Mass Murder in the Name of God
After Moses, the Hebrew Bible expounds on the Hebrew conquest of Canaan. The conquest of Canaan described in the Book of Joshua isn’t supported by historical or archaeological evidence. The consensus opinion of scholars is that this portion of the Hebrew Bible is fictional. For an in depth analysis of the data one can read, What Did The Biblical Writers Know and When Did They Know It, by William G Dever.
What is contained in the Book of Joshua is very unsettling. Joshua is a great warrior who wins battle after battle. Most people are familiar with the legend of Joshua's troops marching around Jericho for seven days with trumpets blaring and then the walls of Jericho collapsed. “They devoted the city to the Lord and destroyed with the sword every living thing in it—men and women, young and old, cattle, sheep and donkeys.”
“When Israel had finished killing all the men of Ai in the fields and in the wilderness where they had chased them, and when every one of them had been put to the sword, all the Israelite returned to Ai and killed those who were in it. Twelve thousand men and women fell that day—all the people of Ai. But Israel did carry off for themselves the livestock and plunder of this city, as the Lord had instructed Joshua.”
“After an all-night march from Gilgal, Joshua took them by surprise. The Lord threw them into confusion before Israel, so Joshua and the Israelite defeated them completely at Gibeon. Israel pursued them along the road going up to Beth Horon and cut them down all the way to Azekah and Makkedah. As they fled before Israel on the road down from Beth Horon to Azekah, the Lord hurled large hailstones down on them, and more of them died from the hail than were killed by the swords of the Israelite.”
“That day Joshua took Makkedah. He put the city and its king to the sword and totally destroyed everyone in it. He left no survivors.” “The Lord gave Lachish into Israel’s hands, and Joshua took it on the second day. The city and everyone in it he put to the sword, just as he had done to Libnah.” “Then Joshua and all Israel with him went up from Eglon to Hebron and attacked it. They took the city and put it to the sword, together with its king, its villages and everyone in it. They left no survivors. Just as at Eglon, they totally destroyed it and everyone in it.” “ Then Joshua and all Israel with him turned around and attacked Debir. They took the city, its king and its villages, and put them to the sword. Everyone in it they totally destroyed. They left no survivors.” “So Joshua subdued the whole region, including the hill country, the Negev, the western foothills and the mountain slopes, together with all their kings. He left no survivors. He totally destroyed all who breathed, just as the Lord, the God of Israel, had commanded.”
The archaeologists have concluded that the Israelite lived among the Canaanites on a friendly basis. The Israelite worshiped the gods of Canaan and followed many of their religious traditions. There are no records of great Israelite battles where large Canaanite cities were destroyed. The entire book of Joshua is fictional.
But what is worse is the actual words in the Book of Joshua. How does a omnipotent being go from a monstrous killer, to the father of a gentle Jesus. I read the Old Testament as a teenager and over the last forty plus years have discovered that people who say that they believe in the Bible stories have never actually read them. No one can justify the mass murder depicted in Joshua. This leaves the believer with the only choice of disregarding what is written. If the believer rejects the validity of the Book of Joshua, what justification exists for believing in any of the other books?
Book of Judges
Joshua dies and the book of Judges opens with a need to battle Canaanites again. The reader is left puzzled, because in Joshua, the Canaanites were totally defeated with city after city totally destroyed. The answer is very simple. The book of Joshua shows god helping the Israelite destroy all of their Canaanite enemies. Judges starts with the Israelites having success against the Canaanites, but then the prophecy of Deuteronomy comes true. The Israelite begin worshiping the Canaanite gods and god turns his back on the Israelite.
To make matters worse a new enemy, the Philistines enters the picture. We are introduced to the Jewish hero Sampson. Sampson defeats 1000 Philistines using the jawbone of a donkey as a weapon. Sampson led Israel for twenty years in the age of the Philistines. Judges tells the story of Sampson and Deliah, and the final heroic death of Sampson. Judges ends with the tribes of Israel disorganized and separate.
The Book of Judges has scant evidence supporting it as a rendition of true history, but as a historical fiction it is one of the more enjoyable tales.
Book of Ruth
The book of Ruth is a short separate story that has little to do with the history of the Israelite. An Israelite Naomi and her husband, Elimelech, and her two sons, Mahlon and Chilion left Bethlehem during a famine and settled in Moab. Naomi's sons married Moabite women named Ruth and Orpah.
The story leaves out the fact that Jewish law forbade Naomi's sons from marrying Gentile women. Naomi was upset with her sons for marrying Gentiles, but did not express any contempt for her sons' serious transgression. The son's and Naomi's husband die, and Naomi decides to return to Bethlehem. Orpah stays in Moab with her mother, but Ruth returns to Bethlehem with Naomi.
Ruth's dedication to Naomi is the main theme of the book. Ruth states, “Where you go I will go, and where you stay I will stay. Your people will be my people and your God my God. Where you die I will die, and there I will be buried. May the Lord deal with me, be it ever so severely, if even death separates you and me.”
Ruth is a woman who freely converted to the Jewish faith. Jews have rarely advocated converting Gentiles to Judaism. This is frequently mentioned in the Old Testament. The reasons for including this book in the Hebrew Bible have been heavily debated by Jewish scholars.
The Jewish Kings
In the Hebrew Bible, King Saul was the first person to unite the twelve tribes of Israel into a single kingdom around 1000 BC. The historical evidence tells a different story. The is no historical evidence that King Saul ever existed. Around 1000 BC some of the northern Jewish tribes had organized into Samaria (which is also referred to as the Kingdom of Israel), and some southern tribes into the Kingdom of Judah, but archaeological or historical evidence of a united Israel is absent.
According to the Hebrew Bible, after King Saul, King David ruled the Jewish people. Some evidence of a house of David existed so a King David may be a real figure, but no evidence exists to support the story of David fighting Goliath or David ruling over a united Samaria and Judah. Jerusalem was a major city during the time of David according to the biblical text, but this doesn’t coincide with archaeological evidence. The Hebrew Bible has the kingdom of David extending from the borders of Egypt into Babylon. None of the scholars writing about ancient Israel support the Biblical version of the size of Jewish kingdom.
David’s son Solomon built the first holy Temple in Jerusalem and Solomon is definitely a historical person. The Hebrew Bible’s descriptions of the wealth of Solomon are universally described as being grossly exaggerated. The legend of Solomon being visited by the Queen of Sheba is not supported by any source other than the biblical writings.
The true history of the Jews prior to the Babylonian exile is hotly debated. The story of a large united Jewish kingdom has been proven to be false. Jewish tribes in what is present day southern Israel were loosely united into the Kingdom of Judah. The northern part of modern Israel and southern Syria were referred to as Samaria or the Kingdom of Israel. In 711 Sargon II of Assyria (modern-day Syria) conquered the Kingdom of Israel and renamed the province Samerina. Samerina was ruled by Assyrians. The southern kingdom Judah which included Jerusalem became a vassal state of the Assyrian empire ruled by native Jews, but under the control of the Assyrians.
Despite being an Assyrian province the people of Samerina kept the Hebrew language. The Jews in Samerina employed an alphabet derived from the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet used by the Israelite community prior to the Babylonian captivity. The Jews in Samerina became known as Samaritans. The Samaritans accept only the first five Hebrew books referred to as the Pentateuch. Some Samaritans in Samerina were taken to Assyria as prisoners and some Assyrians were settled in Samerina, but the dominant religion in the region was the Jewish faith.
The Babylonian Exile
Around 600 BC the Babylonians began to acquire large parts of Samerina. In 597 BC, the Babylonians took control of Samerina and conquered the entire kingdom of Judah. The Babylonians destroyed the temple in Jerusalem, and took thousands of Jews back to Babylonia as prisoners. The Jewish King, Jehoiachin, and other members of the upper class, were deported to Babylonia. Nebuchadnezzar II placed Zedekiah, Jehoiachin’s uncle, on the throne in Jerusalem and left Judah as a vassal state. Jehoiachin and his sons were held hostage in Babylon to discourage Zedekiah from rebelling. Zedekiah did revolt in 587 BC, and the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem in 586 BC. Judah was reduced to a Babylonian province, and the native kingship in Jerusalem came to an end. A significant portion of the Jews from Judah were relocated to various parts of Babylonia to serve as slaves.
Most of the Jews in Babylonia were farmers. They were not forced to give up their religious beliefs. Records indicate the Jews in Babylonia were not mistreated by the Babylonians. Instead of families being separated and working directly for Babylonians, the majority were given land to farm or areas to graze animals. The Jews paid taxes at rates similar to native Babylonians. Jeconiah was a King of Judah taken prisoner by the Babylonians in 597 BC. He was allowed to build a temple, which was later rebuilt and is referred to as the Great Synagogue of Baghdad.
Historians believe that much of the Jewish Bible was written in Babylonia by the Judah exiles. Unlike the surviving Samaritan texts which were written in the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet, the surviving texts from the Babylonian exile were often written in Aramaic and some texts used a variant known as Babylonian Aramaic. The influence of Babylonian culture and mythology is clearly evident in many of the stories in the Hebrew Bible.
The Books of Daniel and Esther
The Books of Daniel and Esther tell the story of the Judah Jews in exile in Babylon. The Book of Daniel has two main parts, the stories at the Babylonian court in chapters 1–6 and the apocalyptic visions in chapters 7–12. The authors of Daniel 1–6 were unaware of the correct chronology of Babylonian and Persian kings. In the Hebrew Bible, King Nebuchadnezzar is succeeded by his son Belshazzar, and Darius the Mede seizes power after Belshazzar is killed. Finally, Cyrus the Persian ascends the throne after Darius. Daniel 1-6 names rulers from the time period, but completely fails when it comes to historical accuracy.
None of the exploits of Daniel have been confirmed by any source other than the biblical text, despite numerous cuneiform tablets from that time period. Experts on the period of the Babylonian exile refer to the Book of Daniel as fictional mythology. The apocalyptic visions in Daniel 7–12 reflect the historical situation around 160 BC, when the actions of the Seleucid king, Antiochus IV Epiphanes, resulted in the Maccabean revolt. The best discussion of Daniel’s visions is in The Book of Daniel: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary by Louis F. Hartmann, and Alexander A. Di Lella.
Similar to the exploits of Moses in Egypt, scholars find no proof that the tales of Daniel have any veracity. These tales are still taught to religious followers across the globe, even though religious scholars agree that historical evidence contradicts most of what was written in these two books of the Hebrew Bible.
The Return to Judah
In 539 the Persian King Cyrus the Great defeated the Babylonians and took control of the Babylonian territories including Judah and Samerina. In 538 Cyrus the Great allowed the Babylonian Jews to return to Judah. The Persian kings returned Babylonian Jews to positions of power in Judah, and created a vassal state with Jerusalem as the capital. The Persians helped rebuild Jerusalem and the temple. Historians have written that Cyrus repopulated Judah to create a buffer zone which helped protect Persian cities from Egyptian armies. Judah Jews fought with Persians in battles against Egyptians.
The Jews who had remained in Samerina claimed that the Jews who spent many years in Babylon had corrupted the Jewish religion. The Persians gave preference to the Judah Jews returning from Babylon and placed them in positions of power in Samerina. The Samaritans had separate synagogues and conflicts grew between the Samaritans and the Judah Jews. The conflicts between the Samaritans and Judah Jews are evident in the Jewish Bible. Reading the Jewish Bible one gets the impression that the Samaritans are not Jews, and most Christians are unaware that the Samaritans were Jews.
Greek, Roman, and Muslim Rule
In 333 BC Alexander the Great conquered Persia and ended the Persian rule of Samerina and Judah. Samerina and Judah were ruled by the Greeks and became part of the Seleucid Empire in 200 BC. The Seleucid rulers tried to eradicate Judaism. In Jerusalem circumcision was outlawed, and possession of the Torah was a capital offense. Many Jews were in favor of Jerusalem becoming a Hellenistic city. The Maccabean Revolt (174–135 BC) in Judah was a civil war with Jews fighting Jews at the beginning.
The Seleucid rulers brought an army from Syria to squash the Maccabean revolt, but after a long conflict the Maccabean Revolt was successful. The Hasmonean Dynasty was established and Judah was again ruled by Jews. The Hasmonean kings continued their conquest from Judah into southern Samerina. Under the Hasmonean kings most of Samerina and all of Judah was under Jewish rule. The Jews finally had a united kingdom, but this united kingdom lasted less than a century.
Around 100 BC Romans invaded the Levant. In 64 BC Judah and Samerina became part of the Roman Empire. The Romans officially combined Judah and Samerina into a territory called Judea. The Roman Empire appointed Herod the Great (a Jew) as ruler of Judea ending the reign of the Hasmonean Empire. In 66 AD there was a Jewish revolt against Roman rule. The Temple and most of Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. The revolt was defeated with the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Jews. In 115 AD a second massive revolt occurred which was again unsuccessful. In 132 a third revolt occurred. After the 132 revolt was quelled all Jews were exiled from Judah. A large number of Judah Jews emigrated to Babylonia where Jewish communities still thrived populated by exiles who never returned to Judah.
The area which was Samerina fared better under Roman rule until Constantine converted to Christianity. Under Byzantine rule the Samaritans became oppressed. Samaritan revolts began in 484 AD. In 529 AD a major revolt began which was defeated by Emperor Justinian. The last Samaritan revolt ended in 629 AD and the Samaritan population was reduced from a peak of one million to only 100,000 at the time of the Muslim invasion in 636 AD.
When the Muslim invasion of Judea began there were very few Jews remaining in Judea. The Muslims had already conquered the territory of ancient Babylon which is now Iraq, and the Jews living in this territory had been well treated. It was not surprising that the Jews in Judea fought with the Muslims to expel the Byzantine Christians. The Samaritan population in northern Judea dwindled to near extinction by the time the Muslims gained full control. The Jews of Judea had already been expelled by the Romans and the Muslims quickly became the majority in Judea. Jews remaining in Judea became second class citizens under Muslim rule. Jews left Judea in large numbers over the next millennium searching for countries which would give more freedom to Jews.
Muslims ruled the territory which is Israel from 636 AD until the 20th century. From a historical perspective the Jewish claim that Israel is their rightful homeland is hard to accept considering how brief of a period of history they ruled the territory. Basing a territorial claim on land because of one group's religious mythology is a weak argument. According to the Jewish faith God promised Abraham that he would rule over Canaan (the territory which is now Israel). This did not come true. The multiple prophesies contained in the Torah have remained unfulfilled.
In the Middle East and many parts of the world people are still willing to kill other people based on acceptance of different mythologies which have zero validation. The question remains, when will people finally reject the fictional mythology which is the basis of the religions?
The Early Life of Jesus
According to the New Testament, Mary and Joseph had to travel to Bethlehem for a Roman census. There is sufficient historical data available to say that the Romans never conducted a census in this manner, so the story is fictional. Mary and Joseph told Jesus that soon after he was born, three wise men came to visit Jesus bearing expensive gifts. It is strange that the son of god who preached against wealth gets presented with expensive gifts upon his birth.
King Herod heard about this possible future king and decided to kill all of the young boys in his realm in an attempt to kill Jesus. But Herod existed in a time when the actions of kings were written down. No one has any record of King Herod murdering a large number of young boys. The "massacre of the innocents" is a fictional story.
At age 10 Jesus was impressing the rabbi's with his knowledge of the Laws of Moses. This little piece of the New Testament is ironic because after he dies his followers reject following the 600+ Laws of Moses which the young Jesus had learned. They kept the first 10 as sacrosanct despite the pronouncement by Moses that the first 10 laws were no more important than the rest.
The few facts we know about Jesus in his early life are bizarre because the census story is not true, receiving precious gifts is antithetical to what Jesus preached, Herod did not commit mass murder of innocent boys, and Christianity rejects the need to follow all of the laws Jesus said were sacred.
Jesus Becomes the Messiah
After having angels and wise men appear at his birth, Jesus spends the next 30 years uneventfully and becomes a carpenter. But suddenly Jesus starts informing everyone that he is the messiah, the son of god. God is displeased with his chosen people, the Jews. Judgment day is now around the corner. He is the son of god and he is the messiah born to save the Chosen People.
But the Hebrew Bible had extensive prophesies about the future messiah, and Jesus did not fit the prophesies. The messiah was to be a great warrior such as Joshua who won battle after battle. Jesus was a mild mannered fellow telling people to turn the other check. Joshua slaughtered his enemies in city after city with help from some angels, and had no problem murdering innocent women and children.
Jesus tells everyone god is extremely upset. The last time he was this upset with mankind he flooded the whole planet and made us all descendants of Noah's family. He saved one good Jewish family to repopulate the planet. Now god was going to destroy the whole planet, but save the good Jews and maybe a few good Gentiles. But Jesus in the New Testament was clearly more interested in saving the Jews. He even makes a few nasty remarks about Gentiles.
Jesus told everyone that God told Moses how we should live. There were 600+ laws Moses had to write down. People were ignoring these laws. God was fed up. The judgment day was right around the corner. It was definitely going to happen, and it would occur in the lifetime of the prophets. Jesus and god knew the future. The poor souls in Asia that didn't even learn about the laws of Moses were just going to be collateral damage.
Jesus had to act fast and save as many people as possible by getting them to be good Jews and obey all of the laws of Moses. Follow all of the laws of Moses, and be saved. To follow all of the laws of Moses, a good Gentile had to be circumcised. While all Jewish newborns were circumcised at birth, a circumcision of an adult was probably a painful and dangerous procedure. But Jesus wasn't interested in convincing Gentile men to be circumcised, his mission was to save as many of the Chosen people as possible.
Jesus Gathers Apostles
Jesus gathers hardcore followers who become his apostles. It helps if you can impress them by calming the seas and walking on water.
Despite walking from town to town healing people right and left Jesus got very little publicity. Other self proclaimed messiahs had large numbers of followers and made the historical records, but even raising people from the dead didn't get Jesus recognition. His short career as a messiah wasn't covered by historians of the day.
But apparently Jesus managed to get the Jewish leaders very upset. They were not convinced he was the messiah. The Jewish leaders said Jesus was a fake messiah, and was blasphemous. They asked Herod to do something about this upstart. Mind you that Judea was controlled by the Roman Empire which had no official religion. Judea had many different religions. There is no record that Romans crucified any Jews in Judea for blasphemy during the time Christ lived. So why was Jesus crucified?
The Crucifixion of Jesus
But for the sake of our salvation, Jesus let the Romans crucify him. He left the cruel world of cold and hunger to sit on a throne in heaven next to god. Is that really a sacrifice? Hanging from a cross and getting stabbed must have been miserable, but who wouldn't trade a day of terrible pain to spend an eternity sitting next to the entity who made the planet and controls the universe.
Apparently god (who knows everything and all future events) lied to Jesus about the immediacy of judgment day. God had Jesus telling people it would be in their lifetime. Somehow the Christian church tells people that because Jesus switched from being human to a god, there would be a judgment day but later. The judgment day was coming according to Jesus because the Jews were not following all of the laws of Moses. But after Jesus dies, the Christians said it wasn't necessary to follow the laws of Moses. So who gets saved on the next judgment day, the Jews who remain faithful to all of the laws of Moses which Jesus told everyone was a prerequisite for being saved, or the newly minted followers of Jesus who believe in Jesus but don't believe what he preached.
It is interesting to read a Christian scholar explain how Jesus dying on the cross for us negates the need to follow the laws of Moses which Jesus insisted were the keys to being saved.
The Hebrew Afterlife versus the Christian Afterlife
The subject of death is treated inconsistently in the Hebrew Bible, and different branches of the faith have different views on the subject. The most common view is that a messiah from the lineage of King David will rule Israel. All nations of the world will recognize the god of Israel as the only true god. God would then resurrect the dead, create a new Earth, and heaven. Belief in the future advent of the Messiah is one of the fundamental requisites of the Jewish faith, concerning which Maimonides has written: "Anyone who does not believe in him, or who does not wait for his arrival, has not merely denied the other prophets, but has also denied the Torah and Moses, our Rabbi.
The current Earth and all of its inhabitants would be destroyed on the day of the dead. The righteous and faithful Jews who died in the past and the righteous and faithful Jews who died on this day would be transported to this new Earth. This is what the majority of Jews believe.
Jesus preached that heaven already exists, and people who died and believed in him would immediately go to heaven if they were righteous. This didn't follow the Hebrew teachings at the time of Christ, but this is what is written in the New Testament. The apostles had very little luck convincing Jews that Jesus was the messiah. The messiah was to be the new ruler of Israel, not be crucified by Romans.
This new religious belief that poor people could be guaranteed an eternal life in heaven by believing in Jesus was rapidly accepted by thousands of people. This was a far better deal than the myriad of religions that existed. They were selling a better product which now has more advocates than any other religion.
Most people would agree that the fear of dying ranks first in our life. Accepting a religion no matter how dubious the dogmas are that comes with the promise of a glorious eternal life seems an easy proposition. One can see why believers ignore the irrationality of the religion and became ardent followers. The reward is extremely generous, and no one can prove that the reward of heaven doesn't exist.
Believers could care less that much of the content of the scriptures is primarily fictional stories. The scientific facts which were included with the help of an all knowing God are all wrong. The morality of the God given laws condone slavery, killing homosexuals, and the recommended punishment for cheating on a spouse is death. These little issues pale in comparison to being promised an unproven eternal life. And no one wants to discuss the veracity of the authors making these promises that a heaven exists.
Born approximately 570 CE in the Arabian city of Mecca, Muhammad founded Islam. Revelations received by Muhammad from god delivered through the angel Gabriel form the holy scripture, the Quran. Besides the Quran, Muhammad's teachings and practices (sunnah), found in the Hadith and sira (biography) literature, are also upheld and used as sources of Islamic law (Sharia). Muhammad belonged to a branch of Judaism before starting his own religion. Abraham and Moses are the two most important profits after Muhammad.
Muhammad was not a son of god, but he performed many miracles. There is a long list of miracles he performed. Muhammad was a warrior and spread Islam through conquest. His message is very close to Christianity. Live a righteous life, and be rewarded with a place in heaven. Similar to the Christians he dropped the Judaic beliefs in afterlife in favor of more immediate rewards of heaven.
Constantine united an empire by promoting one religion which had a very popular message that we would all end up as God's living eternally in a place of splendor. It was a very successful tactic. The people of his empire worshipped a large variety of gods before being united under the banner of Christianity.
Before Muhammad the people of Arabia worshipped a large number of different gods. Muhammad used his religion to unite thousands of people who often opposed each other under one banner of Islam. A cynic would say that Muhammad learned the lesson of Constantine very well.
Is another Holocaust Possible?
I find it difficult to understand how an intelligent human can be brainwashed into believing flying an airplane into a building and killing thousands of people can be perceived as a moral act, but this is power of religious indoctrination. When African Muslims murder every Christian in a village is this my concern? When the military leader of Iran says he wants to obliterate a nation of 9 million people and he is developing weapons capable of carrying out his wish, what do we do?
The Holocaust was the end result of 1000 years of propaganda from the Roman Catholic Church. The Jews were constantly referred to as subhuman. We see similar verbiage coming out of Iran on a regular basis. Anyone who doesn't see the danger is ignoring the greatest risk to a large group of people since the Holocaust. This is happening because 1400 years ago a man convinced people that an angel gave him messages from God.
Religions played a role in early civilizations which had its good sides and bad sides. In my opinion religions have out lived their usefulness. The bad attributes now are significantly more than the good. People should not believe in mythological entities. Morality has always been determined by society, and it is time to view people who believe in baseless mythology as exhibiting bad behavior. It is not cruel to take away a person's faith in an afterlife when that faith is based on ancient texts which are full of lies.
Ask Christians why they believe in an afterlife and they will say the Bible tells them that Heaven exists. The Bible also says the Earth is flat, the sun revolves around the Earth, evolution didn't happen, god flooded the entire Earth but saved Noah, Moses was in Egypt and god inflicted severe plagues on the Egyptians, slavery is acceptable behavior, we should kill homosexuals, etc, etc.
I have heard the argument that people will be depressed if we take away the possibility of a mythical heaven. My response is that they need more Jewish friends. Jews are taught that what you do here on Earth is important and people should not be concerned with any possible afterlife. People will survive without believing in fictional heavens. Atheist do not have a higher rate of depression or suicide, and are far less likely to go to prison.
Western Europe is rapidly increasing the number of people who don't believe in religions. I have yet to read a single article which points to a downside in this trend. We are rapidly progressing to a global society with global moral concepts. This is very good. I do not believe that Christians pose any risk to create another Holocaust, but the only way to enlighten Muslims on the irrationality of their faith would be to expose the irrationality of all religions.
Having people divided by their beliefs in fictional mythologies is absurd, especially when the fictional mythologies can easily be exposed for the sham they present. Indoctrinating children to believe that fictional characters exist should be considered bad moral behavior. All of the reasons for creating religious mythology are long gone. Perpetuating the lies is wrong.
How To Contact ME
I did not put a link to my email address until the very end of my short book because I only want feedback from people who have read the entire book. If you have sources which contradict any of the facts in my book or you have suggestions on adding more material I would be happy to see it. My email is